martes, 19 de enero de 2010

Windows 7 beta 1 performance - How does the OS compare to Vista and XP?

How does Windows 7 beta 1 compare to Vista and XP in terms of performance? That’s a question that’s been hitting my inbox regularly over the past few weeks. Let’s see if we can’t answer it!

Important note: Before I go any further I feel I need to make a point, and make it clear. The build I’m testing of Windows 7 (build 6.1.7000.0.081212-1400) is a beta build, and as a rule beta builds are usually more geared towards stability than performance. That said, the performance of this build should give us a clue as to how the OS is coming along.

Rather than publish a series of benchmark results for the three operating systems (something which Microsoft frowns upon for beta builds, not to mention the fact that the final numbers only really matter for the release candidate and RTM builds), I’ve decided to put Windows 7, Vista and XP head-to-head in a series of real-world tests to find out which OS comes out top.

The tests

There are 23 tests in all, most of which are self explanatory:

1.Install OS - Time it takes to install the OS
2.Boot up - Average boot time to usable desktop
3.Shut down - Average shut down time
4.Move 100MB files - Move 100MB of JPEG files from one hard drive to another
5.Move 2.5GB files - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from one hard drive to another
6.Network transfer 100MB files - Move 100MB of JPEG files from test machine to NAS device
7.Network transfer 2.5GB files - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from test machine to NAS device
8.Move 100MB files under load - Move 100MB of JPEG files from one hard drive to another while ripping DVD to .ISO file
9.Move 2.5GB files under load - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from one hard drive to another while ripping DVD to .ISO file
10.Network transfer 100MB files under load - Move 100MB of JPEG files from test machine to NAS device while ripping DVD to .ISO file
11.Network transfer 2.5GB files under load - Move 2.5GB of mixed size files (ranging from 1MB to 100MB) from test machine to NAS device while ripping DVD to .ISO file
12.Compress 100MB files - Using built-in ZIP compression
13.Compress 1GB files - Using built-in ZIP compression
14.Extract 100MB files - Using built-in ZIP compression
15.Extract 1GB files - Using built-in ZIP compression
16.Install Office 2007 - Ultimate version, from DVD
17.Open 10 page Word doc - Text only
18.Open 100 page Word doc - Text and images only
19.Open simple Excel doc - Basic formatting
20.Open complex Excel doc - Including formula and charts
21.Burn DVD - Win 7 beta 1 .ISO to disc using CDBurnerXP
22.Open 10 page PDF - Text only, using latest Adobe Reader 8
23.Open 100 page PDF - Text and images, using latest Adobe Reader 8
These series of tests will pitch Windows 7 build 7000 32-bit against Windows Vista SP1 32-bit and Windows XP SP3 32-bit. The scoring for each of the tests is simple. The winning OS scores 1, the runner up 2 and the loser scores a 3. The scores are added up and the OS with the lowest score at the end wins.

AntiVirus Head-To-Head: NOD32 vs Kaspersky

What anti-virus product would you use to protect your PC from viruses, malware, or spyware? If you don't know, this article may help you decide between 2 products: NOD32 and Kaspersky.

NOD32 vs. Kaspersky
NOD32

ESET Nod32 provides effective antivirus protection. It doesn't stack up to Kaspersky, but it is a big competitor when it comes to detecting viruses. In fact, NOD32's 2009 product has been considered one of the top anti-virus programs. ESET is working hard to improve its products and surpass its competitors. As of today, NOD32's detection capabilities are notably very good. PC Word Magazine calls it a “Virus Stopper”; NOD32 has been highly recognized and has received many compliments and awards in the past year as it has one of the highest ratings for performance and proactive detection.

Kaspersky

Kaspersky is often mentioned by users as the product offering the best possible protection for users when it comes to anti-virus. Kaspersky's antivirus program is hard to beat for the number of features that offers, its reliability and less intensive use of resources. It's recognized as one of the best anti-virus software today, and the 2009 product has been rated as one of "The Best Antivirus Programs for Windows XP."

Comparing Products
NOD32

It provides proactive detection against viruses and malware. It features on-demand scanning, and updates are in real-time. Additionally, it inspects SSL-encrypted communication channels too. It works fast and has lower system requirements when compared to leading AV software.

ESET NOD32 Antivirus v3.0 includes enhanced proactive scanning technology as well as improvements in removal of threats.

ESET NOD32 Antivirus v.4.0 includes smarter and faster protection. In addition, more proactive protection for computers and data against never-seen- before malicious codes or threats.

Costs:

•ESET NOD32 Antivirus v3.0 is $39.95
•ESET NOD32 Antivirus v.4.0 is $49.99
Kaspersky

This anti-virus product is the better product. The 2009 version provides up-to-date protection, and screens users from Phishing and Malware sites. It offers real-time automated protection against current Internet threats. Additionally, it provides real-time scanning of email. The 2009 anti-virus product, then, provides complete antivirus protection from viruses and spyware, as well as from infected Websites. The KAV 2010 even got better by providing extra tools and features. This version provides essential PC protection (in fully automated real-time) at a price of only $39.95 (at kaspersky.com).

KAV 2010 improvements include identity theft protection and blocking of suspicious programs based on their behavior. It also makes it simple for users to identify unsafe websites by color-coding them.

sábado, 9 de enero de 2010

Sherlock Holmes vs Jack the Ripper Official Video Game Trailer | Sherlock Holmes Video Game Trailer

An earlier post on our site gave Sherlock Holmes versus Jack the Ripper Trailer, the latest version. Now, we’ll show you the first trailer of Sherlock Holmes vs Jack the Ripper released by Focus Home Interactive. Aside from Sherlock Holmes versus Jack the Ripper trailer, we will also provide other info about Sherlock Holmes vs Jack the Ripper Video Game.

Posted below is a photo and video of Sherlock Holmes versus Jack the Ripper, another Sherlock Holmes video game or adventure game with video clips.



Screenshot of Sherlock Holmes vs Jack the Ripper Video Game

The video you are about to watch is the first official trailer of Sherlock Holmes versus Jack the Ripper adventure game. Here is Sherlock Holmes vs Jack the Ripper Official Video Game Trailer.


After watching Sherlock Holmes vs Jack the Ripper Trailer, here are additional info about this Sherlock Holmes Video Game. Sherlock Holmes versus Jack the Ripper is the 6th game in Sherlock Holmes Series of Adventure Games developed by Frogwares. The first 5 games in Frogwares’ Sherlock Holmes Series was all played on PC only. In the sixth game, Sherlock Holmes vs Jack the Ripper Video Game, Frogwares developed the game for Microsoft Windows and Xbox 360 gaming console.

Sherlock Holmes versus Jack the Ripper is a single-player adventure video game. It was published by Focus Home Interactive as part of the Adventures of Sherlock Holmes Series within the first half of 2009. Sherlock Holmes vs. Jack the Ripper was made available through download links and DVDs.

Other adventure games using the character of Sherlock Holmes were also posted on this site. One of these games is The Lost Cases of Sherlock Holmes Game.